2012 Ford F-150 XLT, F-150 Reliability
2012 Ford F-150 XLT

If you’re among the half-million Americans who will purchase a Ford F-150 this year, you will have to decide on an engine. You could go with the more traditional powerplant options: 302-hp 3.7-liter V6, 360-hp 5.0-liter V8, or 411-hp 6.2-liter V8. Or you could go for the “wildcard”—the new EcoBoost 365-hp 3.5-liter turbocharged V6. In 2011, some 40 percent of F-150 buyers chose this new creation.

How Many Different Ways Are There To Build a Ford F-150? Would You Believe 2 Billion?

While you sacrifice power with the 3.7 V6 and fuel economy with the V8s, the EcoBoost is billed as the best of both worlds. With a torque rating of 420, which is 40 more than the 5.0 V8, the EcoBoost is incredibly mighty for its size. It can haul up to 11,300 pounds.

As for fuel economy, an F-150 with the EcoBoost engine and 4WD is EPA rated at 15 mpg city, 21 highway, and 17 combined—a little better than the 14/19/16 numbers for the 5.0-liter V8.

For the EcoBoost engine, you would have to pay either a $1,875 premium over models that come standard with the 3.7 V6, or $895 over those for which the 5.0 V8 is standard. Is it worth the extra cost? That’s an individual decision, but Consumer Guide Auto editors feel that if you can afford the EcoBoost, buy it.

“The 6 is the new 8!” exclaimed one editor after his first test drive. “The EcoBoost V6 is wonderfully smooth and extremely potent.”

Added a fellow editor, “With the EcoBoost V6, it was a snap to enter expressways at highway speed or to pass in normal commuting. The engine is smooth, and its operation is enhanced by the 6-speed automatic transmission.”

Raved a third editor: “The EcoBoost engine is ridiculously strong, feeling like a massive big block rather than some stingier V6.”

Much to Mike Rowe’s chagrin, editors were not terribly impressed with the EcoBoost’s fuel economy. During our three months of driving in real-world conditions, we fell a little short of the EPA estimates. Over the course of 2,255 miles, we averaged a combined 15.7 mpg, with a nearly 50-50 split between city and highway driving. Our low mpg number can be somewhat attributed to cold Chicago weather and the heavy crew-cab body style.

For a complete review of the Ford F-150, click here.

Big-Rig Style: What If Semi-Truck Makers Built Pickups?

Share this: