Site icon The Daily Drive | Consumer Guide®

Test Drive: 2016 Nissan Altima 2.5 SL

2016 Nissan Altima
Nissan’s midsize Altima was restyled for 2016 and gained several new high-tech safety features, many of which were included in our $32,115 test car.

2016 Nissan Altima 2.5 SL

Class: Midsize Car

Dates tested: 3/21/2016 – 3/28/2016

Miles Driven: 270

Fuel Used: 10.3 gallons

CG Report Card
Room and ComfortB
Power and PerformanceB-
Fit and FinishA-
Fuel EconomyC+
ValueB
Report-card grades are derived from a consensus of test-driver evaluations. All grades are versus other vehicles in the same class. Value grade is for specific trim level evaluated, and may not reflect Consumer Guide's impressions of the entire model lineup.
Big & Tall Comfort
Big GuyB
Tall GuyB
Big & Tall comfort ratings are for front seats only. "Big" rating based on male tester weighing approximately 350 pounds, "Tall" rating based on 6'6"-tall male tester.

Real-world fuel economy: 26.3 mpg

Driving mix: 55% city, 45% highway

EPA-estimated fuel economy: 27/39/31 (city/highway/combined)

Base price: $28,570 (not including $835 destination charge)

Options on test car: Moonroof ($800), floor and trunk mats ($210), Technology Package ($1700)

Price as tested: $32,115

 

Quick Hits

The great: Visibility, interior materials for the price, available safety features

The good: Infotainment system ease of operation

The not so good: Cargo versatility

Check out our Midsize Car Best Buys

 

John Biel

Nissan has turned its Altima midsize sedan into a fairly complete car for 2016—at least as complete as its very full and highly competitive market segment requires. Getting to that point has come with some updating of appearances (notably adopting Nissan’s “V-Motion” grille theme) and adding safety and technology features.

Thin roof pillars make visibility one of Altima’s strengths.

The “ultima” of the new Altimas is the SL model that Consumer Guide® editors got to try out. SL standard equipment that is newly available to this vehicle line includes blind-spot and rear cross-traffic alerts, as well as NissanConnect with mobile apps. This last item interacts with smartphones to access apps, music, phone contacts, and maps, and includes Siri Eyes Free and hands-free text messaging. A few other new tech features are optionally available.

SLs with the 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that was in CG’s test car start at $28,570. (A version with a 270-horsepower 3.5-liter V6 and a couple extra standard items lists for $32,090.) That includes items picked up from lower-level Altimas like a continuously variable transmission (CVT), rearview camera, USB port, automatic headlights, 17-inch alloy wheels, fog lights, remote engine start, dual-zone automatic climate control, and satellite radio. To that the SL adds luxury features such as leather upholstery, heated front seats, leather-wrapped heated steering wheel, heated exterior mirrors with LED turn signals, Homelink transmitter, and Bose audio system.

Test Drive: 2015 Toyota Camry XSE

That was hardly the end of the tale for the Consumer Guide® tester, however. The $32,115 total (with delivery) incorporated an extra-cost moonroof, floor and trunk mats, and a $1700 Technology Package. Key features of the tech group are a navigation system, seven-inch color touchscreen, adaptive cruise control, forward-collision mitigation (it automatically applies the brakes in advance of an impending collision), and class-exclusive Predictive Forward Collision Warning, which uses radar to search two vehicles ahead to warn if that vehicle is slowing rapidly.

Interior materials are nice for the price, and infotainment adjustments are relatively easy to execute.

Dressed to the hilt in SL form, the Altima presents well as a comfortable, fairly roomy, and useful intermediate sedan. Seats are supportive with a rich feel, and soft-to-the touch surfaces are generously applied to the dash and door panels. “Brushed Silver Wave” trim—with the look of blond wood—covered portions of the instrument panel and center console of the beige interior in CG’s sample car.

Rear passengers sit slightly higher than their front-seat companions, which allows them to rest a little more flat-footed, thus maximizing legroom—which isn’t half bad. Headroom in back isn’t quite as good as in front, but six-footers will still fit. Entry and exit are uncomplicated, and driver vision is good to all angles thanks to thin roof pillars.

Test Drive: 2016 Honda Accord Touring Sedan

Large speedometer and tachometer dials are easy to read. Between them is the multifunction Advanced Drive Assist display, which doesn’t come off as well. Characters are small, and the display leans back into a depression within the instrument cluster, which just moves the images that much further away from the driver. The optional touchscreen not only controls the nav system but it absorbs the radio preset buttons. Presets are easy to make and retrieve, and volume control and station tuning is handled by separate knobs. As for climate controls, there’s a rotary knob for temperature adjustment, but fan speed and mode selections are regulated by repetitive-step pushbuttons.

Interior storage benefits from an exceptionally deep glovebox; a bin at the front of the console with auxiliary, USB, and 12-volt power inputs; a large two-tier console box with another power point; and a pouch on the back of each front seat. Door panels include modest map pockets with bottle holders. There are two exposed cupholders set into the console, and two more in the rear-seat pull-down armrest.

LED accent lights give the front end some upscale character.

Trunk capacity is average for the class. The area is widest at the rear, but gooseneck hinges extend into the load area, and a foam tire-tool tray under the trunk floor has a very limited space for small items. Standard 60/40-folding rear seat backs make it possible to expand cargo room—with some limits. For one thing, the seat backs don’t lay especially flat, and they rest about three inches above the trunk floor when retracted. For another, a bulkhead behind the seats considerably reduces the size of the pass-through area (though the Altima is hardly alone in this).

Test Drive: 2016 Chevrolet Malibu

The 182-horsepower four-cylinder engine serves the car well, just not spectacularly. Neither jackrabbit nor laggard off the line, it will build enough steam on the expressway to cruise comfortably and pass without worry. The CVT is set up to deliver something with the feel of stepped-gear-transmission shifts, which tamps down the often-noisy free-revving operation of some transmissions of this type. Still, it can’t completely overcome the common CVT bugaboo of leisurely downshifting when more power is needed. The four in the SL is EPA-rated at 27 mpg in the city, 39 on the highway, and 31 combined. This driver would have loved to have seen something close to that in his 126-mile stint in the car. With 58 percent city-type driving, he recorded a curiously low 21.8 mpg.

The Altima SL handles and rides well, though its moves are hardly sporty. (There’s a new SR model for that.) Steering is responsive enough for good maneuverability, and braking is prompt and predictable.

Even with its improvements, the Nissan Altima doesn’t quite rule the roost in the midsize field. It does have its share of things to crow about, though.

Altima is a good all-around sedan that has recently been ranking third in sales (behind Honda Accord and Toyota Camry) in the hotly contested midsize class.

 

 

 

Share this:
Exit mobile version